ESG – From Alternative to Essential – FactSet Insight

Content, analytics, functional, and utility APIs
FactSet and third-party concorded datasets
Integrated software solutions across front, middle and back office
Ebook: Solving the ESG Data Challenge
Join a team of highly motivated, talented individuals who are empowered to find answers through creative technology.
By FactSet Insight  |  November 10, 2022
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) has been a growing focus for Asset Managers over the past few years going quickly from Alternative data to Essential in the overall investment process. The continued appetite from investors and a changing regulatory landscape have all contributed to estimates that ESG will surpass $41 trillion in 2022 and $50 trillion by 2025.

In May, the SEC published a trio of intertwined ESG proposals concerning corporate climate risk disclosures, fund names (including ESG), and enhanced fund and investment adviser ESG disclosures, echoing similar regulatory measures proposed or enacted in jurisdictions around the world. For those of us in the industry who had been “waiting for the other shoe to drop,” it dropped.
The importance of engagement in the ESG investing context is not news to anyone. The development of stakeholder capitalism, the proliferation of stewardship codes, and the emergence of engagement requirements for institutional investors and asset managers are global phenomena. One can cite measures such as the French Energy Transition Law, Shareholder Rights Directive II, UK Stewardship Code, and ESG disclosure guidelines from multiple fund regulators worldwide. The SEC proposal on fund ESG disclosures is intended to combat greenwashing and increase the availability of comparable and decision-useful information for investors.
While the SEC fund ESG proposal* resembles analogous fund regulations worldwide, it subtly elevates the role of engagement in ESG investment strategies. The SEC fund ESG proposal allows funds to pursue an “engagement only” ESG investment strategy—without requiring divestment, ESG screening or portfolio tilts to qualify as an ESG fund. This is an important enabler for passive funds with ESG aims.
The SEC’s definition of ESG-Focused Funds cleanly delineates between funds that use one or more ESG factors as a significant or main consideration 1) in selecting investments or 2) in their engagement strategy with the companies in which they invest. The use of the conjunction “or” in this sentence differentiates the SEC’s approach from most approaches in which engagement is one component of a broader ESG investing strategy rather than the whole strategy.
Like much Sustainable Finance regulation globally, the primary mechanism of the SEC fund ESG proposal is disclosure. The SEC proposal, for example, neither requires funds to pursue ESG investing strategies nor spells out definitions of “ESG,” “green,” “sustainable,” or “responsible.” Under the proposal, ESG investing strategies can be freely pursued or not. If pursued, such strategies can be accomplished as defined and disclosed by funds.
The global adoption and proliferation of voluntary and mandatory shareholder engagement activities by institutional asset managers has driven demand for robust and versatile systems to enable compliance and the effective pursuit of engagement strategies with defined and measured objectives and outcomes. As with any disclosure regulation, the regulation of ESG engagement disclosures activates a host of operational and compliance requirements peripheral to disclosure itself—from policies and procedures to controls, communications (internal, client, and stakeholder), data management, and record-keeping. In short, while the SEC fund ESG proposal allows engagement as a freestanding ESG investment strategy, regulation increases the need for systems that enable the strategy to be pursued efficiently and consistently at scale.
By working with scores of clients in this developing activity with raised compliance stakes, we have uncovered common themes across system requirements to address shareholder engagement workflows, which we characterize as shareholder engagement management systems. Indeed, engagement management systems represent something of a cottage industry, with multiple startups entering the space.
Over the past year, we are seeing more clients document their internal ratings and company engagement using FactSet’s Research Management System. Whether for record-keeping or to do further analysis in their ESG analysis, we are seeing more workflows created around:
ESG Engagement and the Need for Engagement Management Systems

The standard components of today’s shareholder engagement management systems tie together the research, insights, efforts, and results of a range of users across the institutional asset manager’s organization, from research analysts to ESG or responsible investing teams to portfolio managers and performance and reporting teams.
This blog post is for informational purposes only. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.
* Fully titled, “Enhanced Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies about Environmental, Social, and Governance Investment Practices.”
Post Comment
ESG Trending Topics: Fall 2022
The ever-evolving sustainable finance space appears to have entered a paradoxical phase. While some headlines discuss regulations…
By Mackenzie Hargrave  |  ESG
Read more
Mauna Loa and Carbon PPM Trends, September 2022 Update
There are dozens of locations worldwide where atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) levels are recorded and tracked. One of our…
By Tom Abrams, CFA  |  ESG
Read more
Social Washing: Do Policies Guarantee Positive Outcomes?
This article explores information about external stakeholders using the Adverse Outcome Signal, which identifies companies with a…
By Mackenzie Hargrave  |  ESG
Read more
The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.

source