Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat’s full suite of research tools:
Shares of Flywire Co. (NASDAQ:FLYW – Get Rating) have been assigned a consensus rating of “Buy” from the eight analysts that are covering the stock, Marketbeat Ratings reports. Seven equities research analysts have rated the stock with a buy recommendation and one has given a strong buy recommendation to the company. The average 12-month price target among brokerages that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $31.25.
FLYW has been the topic of a number of research analyst reports. Raymond James reduced their target price on Flywire from $33.00 to $28.00 and set a “strong-buy” rating on the stock in a report on Thursday, November 10th. The Goldman Sachs Group lowered their target price on Flywire from $32.00 to $28.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research report on Wednesday, November 9th. Loop Capital initiated coverage on Flywire in a research report on Monday, October 24th. They issued a “buy” rating and a $25.00 target price on the stock. Stephens lowered their target price on Flywire from $30.00 to $26.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a research report on Wednesday, November 9th. Finally, Wells Fargo & Company lowered their price target on Flywire from $30.00 to $27.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a research report on Wednesday, November 9th.

Insider Transactions at Flywire

In other news, major shareholder Enrique T. Salem sold 96,136 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, November 21st. The stock was sold at an average price of $20.51, for a total value of $1,971,749.36. Following the sale, the insider now directly owns 11,645,388 shares in the company, valued at approximately $238,846,907.88. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is available at the SEC website. In related news, major shareholder Enrique T. Salem sold 96,136 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Monday, November 21st. The stock was sold at an average price of $20.51, for a total transaction of $1,971,749.36. Following the sale, the insider now owns 11,645,388 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $238,846,907.88. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this link. Also, Director Jo Natauri sold 147,816 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, December 12th. The shares were sold at an average price of $22.20, for a total value of $3,281,515.20. Following the completion of the transaction, the director now owns 1,070,982 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $23,775,800.40. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Over the last ninety days, insiders have sold 1,827,792 shares of company stock worth $39,175,372. Company insiders own 37.50% of the company’s stock.

Institutional Investors Weigh In On Flywire

A number of institutional investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in FLYW. Vanguard Group Inc. lifted its stake in Flywire by 29.0% in the 3rd quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 7,281,361 shares of the company’s stock worth $167,179,000 after purchasing an additional 1,635,222 shares in the last quarter. Alliancebernstein L.P. boosted its stake in shares of Flywire by 127.3% during the 3rd quarter. Alliancebernstein L.P. now owns 5,221,323 shares of the company’s stock valued at $119,882,000 after purchasing an additional 2,924,057 shares in the last quarter. BlackRock Inc. lifted its position in Flywire by 20.4% during the 3rd quarter. BlackRock Inc. now owns 3,680,820 shares of the company’s stock valued at $84,512,000 after acquiring an additional 624,918 shares during the period. Millennium Management LLC raised its holdings in Flywire by 33.3% in the second quarter. Millennium Management LLC now owns 2,308,228 shares of the company’s stock worth $40,694,000 after buying an additional 576,636 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Eventide Asset Management LLC grew its stake in shares of Flywire by 1,254.5% in the third quarter. Eventide Asset Management LLC now owns 1,800,367 shares of the company’s stock worth $41,336,000 after acquiring an additional 1,667,446 shares during the period. 79.06% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

Flywire Stock Performance

Flywire stock opened at $21.74 on Friday. The firm has a market capitalization of $2.35 billion, a P/E ratio of -46.26 and a beta of 1.21. The stock has a fifty day moving average price of $21.16 and a 200 day moving average price of $21.99. Flywire has a 52 week low of $14.56 and a 52 week high of $39.31. The company has a current ratio of 3.44, a quick ratio of 3.44 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.05.
Flywire (NASDAQ:FLYW – Get Rating) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, November 8th. The company reported ($0.04) EPS for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.06 by ($0.10). The firm had revenue of $88.90 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $86.94 million. Flywire had a negative return on equity of 10.43% and a negative net margin of 18.85%. Equities research analysts anticipate that Flywire will post -0.47 earnings per share for the current year.

About Flywire

(Get Rating)
Flywire Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a payment enablement and software company in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, and internationally. Its payment platform and network, and vertical-specific software help clients to get paid and help their customers to pay.

Recommended Stories

• Get a free copy of the StockNews.com research report on Flywire (FLYW)
• Your Decision to Buy Palantir May Simply Be a Matter of Time
• Are Caterpillar and Deere Setting Up to Rally in 2023?
• Mullen Automotive Gets a Jolt as the I-GO™ Arrives in Europe
• Will The Sun Shine On These 3 Large-Cap Solar Stocks In 2023?
• Lucid Motors Faces a Reality That May Cloud a Bullish Perception

This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest and most accurate reporting. This story was reviewed by MarketBeat’s editorial team prior to publication. Please send any questions or comments about this story to contact@marketbeat.com.
Before you consider Flywire, you’ll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and Flywire wasn’t on the list.
While Flywire currently has a “Buy” rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Looking to generate income with your stock portfolio? Use these ten stocks to generate a safe and reliable source of investment income.
Thinking about investing in Meta, Roblox, or Unity? Enter your email below to learn what streetwise investors need to know about the metaverse and public markets before making an investment.
Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat’s full suite of research tools:
View the latest news, buy/sell ratings, SEC filings and insider transactions for your stocks. Compare your portfolio performance to leading indices and get personalized stock ideas based on your portfolio.
Get daily stock ideas from top-performing Wall Street analysts. Get short term trading ideas from the MarketBeat Idea Engine. View which stocks are hot on social media with MarketBeat’s trending stocks report.
Identify stocks that meet your criteria using seven unique stock screeners. See what’s happening in the market right now with MarketBeat’s real-time news feed. Export data to Excel for your own analysis.
As Featured By:
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103
contact@marketbeat.com
(844) 978-6257
© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2022. All rights reserved.
© 2022 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided ‘as-is’ and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see Barchart’s disclaimer.

source

Formulated Solutions inks deal to buy former Merck, Bayer …  FiercePharma
source

source

When it comes to digital files, PDF is the one format to rule them all. It’s the one format that lets you exchange formatted documents with anyone, anywhere, using any operating system. Adobe invented the portable document format in 1993, and in its many versions, Adobe Acrobat is the one app that towers over all others that view and manage PDFs, even if other apps are better in some aspects. This review focuses on Acrobat Pro, the highest-end of Acrobat’s many versions, but even the minimalist free version, Adobe Acrobat Reader, is worth having if you don’t want or need the full versions.
Acrobat isn’t cheap. Acrobat Pro costs $19.99 per month with a one-year commitment, or a much less costly $239.88 per year if paid for the year upfront. If you pay month to month with no commitment, it’s $29.99 per month. Pro runs on Windows and macOS.
A lower-featured Acrobat Standard, for Windows only, costs $12.99 per month with a one-year commitment, or $155.88 if you pay for the full year upfront. It’s $22.99 per month if you pay monthly with no commitment. If you choose Standard, you don’t get document comparison, redaction, or built-in OCR that converts scanned PDFs to editable documents. 
As a software reviewer, I get a lot of free review copies of many apps, but Acrobat Pro is one of the few apps I happily pay for every year. If you don’t like subscriptions, older, lower-featured permanent-license (one-time payment) versions are available: Acrobat Pro 2020 costs $538.80, and Acrobat Standard 2020 costs $358.80. 
The free Adobe Acrobat Reader version is available for Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android. It lets you add comments to PDFs as the full-priced versions do. You can use two desktop or laptop copies of Acrobat with your account; it doesn’t matter if the two copies are on the same OS platform or different ones. If you start up Acrobat on a third machine, you’ll be prompted to log out of one of two machines you already use, and you can always go back to the logged-out machine and log in again.
Why should you pay for a PDF app? After all, modern operating systems have built-in PDF viewing and markup software that let you draw arrows and circles or add text-only notes to existing PDFs. Microsoft Edge does this under Windows, and Preview does the job on a Mac. 
A commercial app like Acrobat Pro adds optical character recognition (OCR) to convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs. It also adds redaction features, editing features that let you correct typos and replace images, file-comparison features for finding differences between versions, and PDF-signing features that let you create and process documents for others to sign. Adobe stands out among the competition for its secure Document Cloud service that makes it easy to exchange PDFs via the cloud and lets you perform advanced signing and editing functions on Adobe’s mobile PDF apps.
A subscription-based copy of Acrobat updates itself every two or three months, and the latest release changes the app’s name from Acrobat Pro DC to Acrobat Pro. If you’re a longtime user who never figured out that DC stood for Document Cloud, you’re a member of a popular club. 
Other recent enhancements include onboarding tutorials that appear when you first run the app or any of its tools that you haven’t used before. And, in the unlikely event that you own a Meta Quest or Meta Quest Pro virtual-reality headset and want to manage PDFs in the metaverse instead of on your desktop or laptop, you can now—as of October 2022—install a Meta version of Acrobat to your headset and activate it with an existing Acrobat account or create a new account. I don’t see this as part of my future, but maybe it’s something you’ll want to try. Anything’s possible.
Acrobat takes some getting used to because its interface isn’t like anything else. Other PDF apps tend to have a ribbon-style interface, more or less like Microsoft 365 apps. Acrobat goes its own way with an interface that uses a standard top-line menu for opening and managing files and one or more toolbars for manipulating the content of a PDF document. 
When you’re merely viewing a PDF, Acrobat shows a standard toolbar with icons for viewing and sharing or selecting content. You can extend this toolbar with a customizable set of quick tools that you can choose from any of the app’s many features. A right-hand pane in the main window, which you can open or hide, displays a customizable list of other sets of tools for adding comments, editing, redacting text or images, scanning or OCR features, form creation and form filling, and much more. When you select one of these tool sets, a second toolbar appears below the standard one. The commenting toolbar, for example, lets you add text boxes, lines, arrows, circles and ellipses, and much more.
When you view a PDF, Acrobat lets you split the window horizontally so that one part of the file appears in the top pane and another part appears in the bottom pane. Unlike other PDF apps I’ve seen, Adobe also has a Spreadsheet Split feature that works like the freeze feature in spreadsheet apps that keeps the top row and left column visible while you scroll through the rest. This feature is useful mostly in viewing PDFs made from spreadsheets, but it could also be useful for keeping a map legend visible while you explore the rest of a map. 
Acrobat also offers a Reading view that hides most of the interface, but it doesn’t offer a view that displays only the unformatted text of a PDF, a feature I’ve found only in Foxit PDF Editor Pro. As in other PDF apps, you can drag and drop pages to reorder them and insert pages from other files and formats. For example, you can drag a Word document into the thumbnail images of an existing PDF, and Acrobat will convert the Word document into PDF format and insert it into the existing PDF pages.
Go deep into Acrobat’s interface, and you’ll find an astonishing wealth of features. The Comments toolset lets you write or draw almost anything on a file, and you can omit the comments when you export the file. From the Forms tools, you can create a fillable PDF form either by modifying an existing Word document or a PDF or by creating a form from scratch and adding text and fill-in fields from a toolbar. Advanced users and IT departments can apply JavaScript actions to form fields. The Forms tool set also lets you mail out the form and collect responses via email or set up a tracking system that sends out multiple PDF copies and gathers comments and markup into your original copy. 
Its interface has some inconsistencies because Acrobat has grown enormously over the years. For example, when you start with the Forms tool set, you can create a form from scratch, but when you access the same feature from the topline menu, the option to create a form from scratch is grayed out. No one seems to know why. 
Acrobat also allows you to create a web-based form on Adobe’s server, with a link that lets you add the form as a live page on your own website. You launch the form-creating process in Acrobat, but you create the form in a web browser using an Acrobat-like interface to upload an existing PDF or Microsoft 365 file. Then you add form fields and set up methods of sharing or tracking the form. Like all other advanced PDF apps, Acrobat offers full management features for creating and using digital signatures. 
Graphic designers seem to prefer Acrobat to all other PDF software for its uniquely powerful Preflight features that prepare files for professional printing and online display. Acrobat offers a long list of prebuilt operations for converting fonts and colors for specific print jobs, plus a troubleshooter that analyzes a PDF and suggests changes. I’m not a graphics professional, but I’ve used Acrobat’s Preflight features to fine-tune scanned PDFs to reduce file size without losing visual detail.
One major feature in commercial PDF apps is their ability to use OCR to convert a scanned PDF into a searchable PDF and export it to a standard editable format like Microsoft Word or Excel. If you need this feature, you should experiment with the free trials of all major PDF apps because there’s no way to predict which one will work best with the kinds of documents that you use. Over the years, I consistently get the best results from Editors’ Choice winner ABBYY FineReader Pro with its brilliantly powerful and efficient OCR editor that lets you correct OCR errors at top speed. 
Acrobat’s OCR software is very effective but doesn’t match FineReader’s in accuracy or efficiency, and its proofreading menu requires too many clicks for anyone to use it with a long document. Foxit PDF Editor Pro uses a licensed version of the technology in an older version of FineReader with a more awkward interface than the one in the current FineReader version. 
Another high-end PDF app, Kofax Power PDF Advanced, uses a licensed version of OmniPage’s OCR technology, less accurate than Acrobat’s or FineReader’s, and with a clumsy interface. And another PDF app, Nitro Pro, integrates technology from I.R.I.S., which, in my testing, ranks below FineReader, Acrobat, and OmniPage in power and convenience.
If you want to export a scanned PDF to a standard editable format, FineReader is by far the best choice because of its many options to export with different levels of formatting so that you’re more likely to get a document that isn’t cluttered with random marks from a scanned image. If you have a PDF that wasn’t scanned but was created directly from a word processor or spreadsheet, then any PDF app will do a serviceable job of exporting back to an Office format. But again, you should experiment with the documents that you normally use. One feature to keep in mind: Kofax Power PDF 5 Advanced and FineReader Pro both have a Watched Folder feature that automatically converts documents placed in that folder to PDFs.
For all its wealth of features, Acrobat sometimes surprises me by lacking a feature that one or more other apps include. For example, Acrobat has no whiteout tool for removing text or stray marks. Foxit PDF Editor Pro and Nitro PDF Pro both have one. In Acrobat and any other advanced PDF app, you can use the powerful redaction tool to remove text or graphics, but it requires more steps than seems necessary to simply remove some text. When you scan a book, your scanned images might contain two facing pages. ABBYY FineReader automatically splits those images in two, one for each page. Annoyingly, Acrobat doesn’t, although some users report success with a Page Splitter add-in from KHKonsulting that I haven’t tried.
Acrobat isn’t cheap, and you should consider alternatives before committing yourself to it.
The most impressive alternative I’ve found is Foxit PDF Editor Pro, priced at $149 per year for a license that works on either Windows or macOS. A Foxit license is good for only one computer, however, not two as in Acrobat. The Foxit app integrates with Microsoft’s Azure Information Protection system and the iManage and eDocs digital management systems. It also has a text-only view option that I haven’t seen elsewhere. For me, the worst feature of Foxit’s app is its fuchsia-purple interface which can’t be changed to a less annoying color. 
Kofax Power PDF 5 Advanced is priced attractively at $179 for a permanent license, no subscription needed. It includes a Watched Folder feature, and the many law offices that still use WordPerfect will value its option to export to WordPerfect. Like Acrobat, it lets you apply page numbering to thumbnail images so that the thumbnail numbering matches the numbers on the actual pages. Kofax’s advanced version is Windows-only, but you can choose a reduced Mac version called Power PDF 4.2 Standard for Mac ($129).
Nitro PDF Pro is also a one-time purchase, $179.99 for Windows or Mac, which you have to buy separately. It’s slightly less feature-packed than other apps, with less effective OCR, but with an Office-like interface that’s easy to navigate. Because PDF is an open format, you can find many other apps at various price ranges that may be worth trying.
I said at the start that it’s hard to find an app that can create a PDF from a web page without inserting page breaks. In fact, I’ve only found one, and it exists only on the Mac. It’s called Paparazzi! (with the exclamation mark), and it’s freeware, with donations accepted. If you know of a Windows equivalent, please let me know.
What about free online PDF editing? Dozens of free cloud-based PDF services are out there, but I’m reluctant to trust them with my data. I use Adobe’s online services because Adobe is well-established and has enough high-powered clients to let me trust its security. But I really don’t want to start sending my files to an online site named something like FlyByNightPDF when I don’t know whether it’s based in a dictatorship where the government makes a copy of every file I send and I have no trust that the PDF I upload won’t come back to me with hidden malware or spyware. When a site offers free PDF processing, it’s worth asking what the site might be getting in return.
Adobe Acrobat Pro is our Editors’ Choice winner for PDF software thanks to its enormous power and deep feature set, despite the absence of a few convenience features like page-splitting and whiteout. If you already own our Editors’ Choice winner in the OCR app category, ABBYY FineReader Pro, then it can double as a PDF app, though without the full feature set in Acrobat. Otherwise, you can’t go wrong with Adobe Acrobat Pro.
PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering lab-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.
PCMag PCMag.com and PC Magazine are among the federally registered trademarks of Ziff Davis, LLC and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission. The display of third-party trademarks and trade names on this site does not necessarily indicate any affiliation or the endorsement of PCMag. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product or service, we may be paid a fee by that merchant. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

source

Static testing is a software testing method that examines a program — along with any associated documents — but does not require the program to be executed. Dynamic testing, the other main category of software testing, requires testers to interact with the program while it runs. The two methods are frequently used together to ensure the basic functionalities of a program.
Instead of executing the code, static testing is a process of checking the code and designing documents and requirements before it’s run to find errors. The main goal is to find flaws in the early stages of development because it is normally easier to find the sources of possible failures this way.
It’s common for code, design documents and requirements to be static tested before the software is run to find errors. Anything that relates to functional requirements can also be checked. More specifically, the process will involve reviewing written materials that provide a wider view of the tested software application as a whole. Some examples of what’s tested include the following:
Some benefits of static testing include the following:
Static testing is carried out with two different steps or techniques — review and static analysis. Static review is typically carried out to find and remove errors and ambiguities found in supporting documents. Documents reviewed include software requirements specifications, design and test cases. The documents can be reviewed in multiple ways, such as in a walkthrough, peer review or inspection.
The next step, static analysis, is where the code is analyzed. The evaluation is done to find any structural defects that could lead to errors when the program runs.
Some other techniques used while performing static testing include use case requirements validation, functional requirements validation, architecture review and field dictionary validation.
Use case requirements ensure possible end-user actions are properly defined. Functional requirements will identify any necessary requirements for the software. Review of architecture analyzes the business-level processes. Field dictionary validation will analyze user interface fields.
Static testing can also be conducted manually or automated with various tools.
The first step in static testing is reviews. They can be conducted in numerous ways and look to find and remove errors found in supporting documents. This process can be carried out in four different ways:
Dynamic testing assesses the feasibility of a software program by giving input and examining output.
The biggest difference between static and dynamic testing is that the code must compile and run in dynamic testing. Static testing can be performed without the application running. Functional behavior and performance are checked to confirm if the code works properly.
Static testing will analyze the code, requirements documents and design documents, while dynamic testing will look at the functional behavior of software systems such as memory usage and performance.
Static testing essentially gives an assessment of code, while dynamic testing will try to find active bugs. From a time and cost perspective, dynamic testing is often more expensive than static testing.
The two types of testing are not meant to be mutually exclusive, however. Ideally, they should be used together. Static testing is about the prevention of defects, whereas dynamic testing is about finding active defects.
Types of dynamic testing include unit testing, integration testing, system testing and performance testing.
Static testing tools can be used to automate the static testing process. Some examples include the following:
Open source PaaS is a good option for developers who want control over application hosting and simplified app deployment, but not…
PaaS is a good option for developers who want control over application hosting and simplified app deployment, but not all PaaS …
It is challenging to find the right balance between performance, availability and cost. Learn how to enable and apply AWS Compute…
To establish the right development team size, managers must look at each member’s responsibilities and communication paths, as …
While it’s not necessarily easy to become certified in microservices architecture, there are plenty of courses you can take to …
The Golden Hammer antipattern can sneak up on a development team, but there are ways to spot it. Learn the signs, as well as some…
With fewer tools and data repositories to wrangle and Elastic cluster management outsourced to SaaS, Dish Media’s ops teams …
Rightsizing Kubernetes workloads requires maintenance to be effective, so set up a Kubernetes capacity plan to prepare and …
Observability tools can give developers and IT administrators better insight on applications to improve delivery, performance and…
When you compare Scrum vs. Kanban, you realize there are as many similarities as there are differences. Here we help you choose …
Do you know Java? Are you trying to learn TypeScript? Here are five differences between TypeScript and Java that will make the …
The job a product manager does for a company is quite different from the role of product owner on a Scrum team. Learn key …
Many organizations struggle to manage their vast collection of AWS accounts, but Control Tower can help. The service automates …
There are several important variables within the Amazon EKS pricing model. Dig into the numbers to ensure you deploy the service …
AWS users face a choice when deploying Kubernetes: run it themselves on EC2 or let Amazon do the heavy lifting with EKS. See …
All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2006 – 2022, TechTarget

Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

source

25 October 2018, Berlin: An employee shows the new mobile POS system at the Deutsche Bahn … [+] presentation of new products and services. Photo: Britta Pedersen/dpa-Zentralbild/dpa (Photo by Britta Pedersen/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Software applications go both ways. Horizontal software applications are those apps that could apply to a wide variety of use cases across any industry and work in the hands of almost any user – think about Word, Excel, the core functions of most databases as well as a whole selection of apps a user might find on their smartphone such as WhatsApp, Twitter, Google Maps and so on.
These are horizontal apps, they’re multi-use-case and multi-applicable, if not quite perfectly multi-purpose in the widest possible sense.
Then there are vertical applications.
A vertical application could be (to conjure up some extreme and less radical examples), a retail cash register software solution specifically built for the needs of golf professional shops, with unique Point of Sale (PoS) functions for shop merchanise, golf course booking slot options and player equipment repair management functions.
Equally and perhaps more broadly, a vertical application could be a Field Service Management (FSM) application designed to look after engineers’ interests when on gas maintenance visits, building inspections or some form of repair job. Often still custom-coded to the use case in hand depending upon its level of adaptability, vertical application software suite and platform providers strive to build as much customizability into their tools as possible so that they can apply to as broad a range of deployments as possible.
Why the fuss and focus on vertical apps?
Because we’re at that watershed-tipping-inflexion point where the enterprise software industry has produced a weight of product that now enables us to start looking after more specialized use cases. In truth, the golf shop app example stems from a real world app that stretches back to the 1990s, but there are now enough tiers of automation and data analytics intelligence for us to start thinking about this more directly.
Indeed, as Kaitki Agarwal of A5G Networks, Inc. has already noted here this year in a Forbes Technology Council Expert Panel story, “Industries are transforming and technologies are converging. In the past, platform developers or application developers did not necessarily need insight into other technologies such as Machine Learning (ML), 4G, 5G functions and so on. In today’s world, it will become important for developers to be ‘T-shaped’ – that is, to have deep vertical knowledge as well as horizontal knowledge and expertise.”
This notion of T-shaped development is perhaps meant to convey a broad base upper layer of knowledge i.e. competency with operating systems, popular programming languages, widely used development environments and established software delivery methodologies such as the Agile (CAPS A deliberate) approach. But, crucially, it will also incorporate a long tail stem (the vertical part of the T) where a developer’s knowledge extends downwards into an industry or use case specialism… and this is why we sometimes now use the term ‘domain experts’ i.e. people that know the nuances of the coalface.
The complexity of modern software development makes the concept of a full-stack developer nonsensical suggests Joe Drumgoole, senior director of developer relations at cross-platform document-oriented database company MongoDB. He points us to the fact that in 2003 Eric Evans wrote “Domain Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software”.
“Even then [in 2003], Evans put domain knowledge and ‘bounded contexts’ at the center of software design.. A bounded context establishes a domain that a single team can work on independently of others. The contextual firewall is then the Application Programming Interface (API) or the contract between the technology service consumer and the originator,” explained Drumgoole.
He further notes that this was an extension of ‘design by contract first established by Bertrand Meyers in the 1990s. The point is that complexity has always been a problem and the solution is never ‘programmers must just get better’ somehow. Instead, we have developed better and higher-level abstractions.
“Hence single node databases begat distributed databases, TCP/IP begat HTTP, and RPC begat REST,” said MongoDB’s Drumgoole.
Getting software application developers to understand the business and the market need is key to success in any successful company. This means that developers can work in cross-functional teams alongside Line of Business (LoB) team members and speak the same language around problems, rather than simply looking at the technology involved.
In Cassandra-centric database company DataStax’s ‘State of the Data Race’ report this year, as many as 91 percent of respondents from organizations with a strategic focus on deploying enterprise software applications that use data in real-time said that developers, business owners and data scientists are working in cross-functional teams – hence the potential for greater development of vertical applications.
“Companies win by empowering teams closest to the customer experience or business process to roll up their sleeves, dig in and make a difference in a quick, Agile fashion. That includes understanding the minutiae of the industry and how its processes work in practice. Shared curiosity and drive are critical for every role, including developers,” said Bryan Kirschner, vice president strategy at DataStax.
It seems clear, any organization is going to have distinctive relationships with its customers and business processes that are broken down in their own special ways. Delays and disconnects happen when business owners who don’t fully understand technology try to communicate with developers… who, in turn, don’t fully understand the pain points or the upside opportunity.
“The notion of a ‘vertical’ application might be a slightly odd notion in some senses – I mean, all applications are used in a vertical setting, essentially,” said Marne Martin, IFS’s president of service Management, EAM, and Global Industries. “What I would say is that you can come at the enterprise software market from a best-of-suite solution perspective (i.e. an end-to-end suite of applications where integration is inherent), or a best-of-breed solution (where functionality is more specialized, but some level of integration to other systems will be needed). Companies need to evaluate their current landscape together with their business goals and ambitions – and then recognize the pros and cons in their decision in terms of speed of roll-out, impact on customer service, operational efficiencies… and so on.”
Given the discussion thus far then, does the scenario (or perhaps spectre) of Line of Business domain-specific software application development mean programmers and other software engineers working in a dedicated stream will pigeon-hole themselves into a role they can’t transfer out of?
“This is not a concern that the software industry should have – and vertical specialism is happening at every level from the way the cloud hyperscalers [AWS, Google Cloud Platform and Microsoft Azure] are bringing new services to market… and the way we as technology platform makers are honing and aligning services today,” said an upbeat Prakash Vyas, head of portfolio at OutSystems, a company known for its low-code and application modernization approach.
For Vyas, it’s more a question best of breed technologies developing at a more cerebral higher level and of developers embracing those innovations with a view to gaining competency and skills, but retaining what he calls a ‘transferability of experience’ across use cases, even when working in narrower industry vertical scenarios.
“Many industries share commonalities or system characteristics that other companies are in fact trying to learn from others that they see as leading the way. For example, if you’ve supported a high-touch sales organization in financial services you may be well set up to do the same in healthcare, because organisations in that sector have similar relationships with patients. So vertical software development is not a closed shop – the message to developers should be: excel at what you do, strive for more, apply it to the requirements in hand, think about how you might also be able to help others,” summarized OutSystems’s Prakash.
Despite our (hopefully) creative use of a television-themed title for this piece (and yes, we realize that nobody younger than Generation-X will know what a TV horizontal hold knob was, or possibly still is, we can now perhaps think about technology growth in more than one plane.
The technology industry likes, no loves, no… adores talking about scale; it’s a means of validating expansion, augmentation and enhancement to guarantee the future worth of tech in general. But rather than just thinking about scale for upward growth, we can now think about vertical scale for the number of users and size of data estate in a horizontally expanding fashion.
Vertical software is real, please do not adjust your set.

source

An intranet is a private network of endpoints, servers, content, and frontend UI for productive employee experiences.

An intranet is defined as a network of endpoint devices and servers with a content engine and frontend systems that allow users to access company information in one place, talk to each other, collaborate on files, and enjoy a social media-like experience – operating within a private, secure perimeter. This article provides an overview of the intranet. It explains what an intranet is, how it works, and how it is accessed. It also discusses the critical components of an intranet system.
An intranet is a network of endpoint devices and servers with a content engine and frontend systems that allow users to access company information in one place, talk to each other, collaborate on files, and enjoy a social media-like experience – operating within a private, secure perimeter. 

An Example of a Desktop Intranet Built Using Microsoft SharePoint | Source
The intranet is a restricted network used to securely communicate corporate information and computer resources among workers inside an organization. It improves communication inside a business and facilitates team member access to vital information, connections, applications, forms, and corporate record databases. A database containing the usernames of all workers with network access privileges is frequently employed to manage intranet security.
Intranet software emerged alongside the web in the 1990s, with the primary distinction being that intranets are private (and hence safe), while the net is an open, accessible network.
Owing to the security it provides, an intranet is used chiefly for information interchange, updates, data storage, and workflow management. Users may also be aware of an extranet, which is an intranet that is available to anyone outside the company, such as your clients or business partners.
Intranet security and functioning require a web server that controls requests for data stored on the server. The web server finds and delivers specified files to the appropriate user. Additionally, One must create a content management system to oversee intranet content creation, publication, and upkeep.
In addition to local area networks (LANs) and lease lines linked to wide area network resources, an intranet may also comprise many connected LANs. The intranet web server utilizes transmission control protocol (TCP/IP), HTTP, and additional internet protocols. An intranet often connects to the web and other resources outside the organization through one or more gateway computers.
To access the workplace intranet, employees must have an individual network password and be connected to the business’s local area network (LAN). Using only a virtual private network (VPN) or another secure connection, remote workers access the intranet. The VPN enables users who aren’t linked to the required LAN to access the intranet and receive the same services and data as users who are registered on the LAN.
Intranets are also made available via hosted software packages. Instead of a private server, a company obtains intranet software that performs the same functions as conventional intranets. Some modern intranets link to various corporate applications akin to social networking services.
See More: What Is FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array)? Meaning, Working, and Uses
To develop an intranet system (rather than choosing a hosted solution), a business would require the following components:
The intranet software’s primary aim is to link workers throughout the organization. For enterprises adopting remote and flexible work, this involves working with team members on work-related tasks, providing easy accessibility to team documentation and workspaces, and ensuring that all team members are always linked to vital business information. Intranets are virtual workplaces where workers congregate, collaborate on projects, provide feedback on new initiatives, store objectives, and communicate across the organization.
See More: Wifi 5 vs. Wifi 6: Understanding the 10 Key Differences
The primary characteristics you need in an enterprise-grade intranet are:
The critical aspect of an intranet is the centralized storage of an organization’s vital data. Employees need to be able to locate the information they want without becoming lost in a labyrinth of hyperlinks. Intranet search engines must be robust and capable of indexing all intranet material. In search, organizations should increasingly seek to use metadata and artificial intelligence (AI).
Modern intranets are designed for worker mobility. Many workers want flexibility in their jobs, and the vast majority require a secure network wherever they are. A cloud-based intranet enables employees to work from anywhere and provides them access to necessary tools and widgets, whether at the office or on the move.
The bulk of company documentation resides digitally nowadays on a server, a hard drive, or an email inbox. An intranet may centralize them, making them readily discoverable and available to end users. With a centralized repository, you can be confident that everybody has the most up-to-date version. And you may cease filling the inboxes of others. In addition, the intranet should facilitate the organization of your content into distinct libraries.
Communication hubs promote the sharing, socialization, and collaboration of workers. Whether you need to send out content organization-wide, share the newest user interface concepts with a small group, or want a location to discuss the upcoming social event, hubs enable workers to engage rapidly and target the appropriate individuals. Additionally, users need to be able to broadcast instant messages to a single recipient or an entire group.
When appropriately utilized, org charts may be instructive and foster cooperation and innovation. The intranet must give workers an easily accessible organizational chart that presents competencies, resources, and contact details in a simple manner. Users must be able to search by individual, department, geographic area, and talent. Administrators should maintain authority over the material displayed to particular workers. One may accomplish this by establishing a hierarchy.
It is unavoidable that any intranet will necessitate regular maintenance and updates to guarantee that the material offered is correct and valuable. Adding a picture or modifying material shouldn’t be complicated or time-consuming. Surprisingly, many systems need the assistance of technically competent individuals to perform these duties. But the intranet should ideally have a simple edit function to make changes and updates.
Most companies utilize an intranet to provide internal information, such as news articles. The intranet should include content creation tools as user-friendly as top content management systems. Key features must include text editing, picture uploading, audience, launch date selection, social sharing, commenting, and “like” capabilities.
The mobile-centric culture of today has simplified intranet accessibility for workers. Responsive design implementation offers quick intranet accessibility on smartphones and other mobile devices, culminating in an excellent user experience. With such a mobile intranet, workers can check in from anywhere, allowing quicker responses. It provides workers with a more comfortable method to communicate and consume information.
Effective file management may not seem as exciting as other features, but it is essential for workers. It simplifies administrative tasks, such as locating paperwork and important information. Outdated documents are frequently one of the significant difficulties with intranets. Ensure that your file management functionality enables you to allocate ownership rights to specific users to prevent this.
See More: GSM vs. CDMA: Understanding the 10 Key Differences
Intranet homepages serve a crucial function since they are often the entry point to intranet material and, occasionally, the digital workplace as a whole. To maintain traction, a homepage must thus aggregate messages, provide connections and navigation to the information and systems workers need, and be compelling and aesthetically pleasing.
Some duties, despite being commonplace, slow employees down. Consequently, you should seek out a business intranet site that can streamline — and automate —  many of these monotonous tasks. Things such as documentation approval, task creation, and duty assignment may not require much time individually, but they can accumulate over time. The greater the degree to which you can automate workflows, the more effort your users can devote to other crucial aspects of their tasks.
One must be able to tailor your intranet to the brand and requirements of your company. There may also be organizational variations from one department area to the next. Intranet technology may also be capable of learning from its consumers and allowing them to design the sites they want. This is due to features such as personalized accounts, labels for projects and abilities, authored or liked material, etc.
A non-integrated network becomes isolating and challenging to utilize. An intranet connected with other apps, like Google Workspace, SharePoint, and Teams, may provide users with a variety of information and capabilities. Complete integration with existing business suites facilitates access and fosters a unified work environment. One should also search for third-party connections through application programming interfaces (APIS), such as HR planning, communications, survey tools, etc., that enrich your organization.
Businesses store critical and confidential information on their internal communication platforms that they must safeguard against hackers, malware, data breaches, and hostile assaults. Additionally, organizations seeking a more secure internal network may consider migrating to cloud-based systems, which offer additional protection of cloud security.
On unique intranet sites and pages, one may structure company strategy, regulations, service contracts, HR data, and anything else. Distributing information in this manner may break down departmental silos and provide everyone with a central location from which to access resources. Company pages must be adaptable and user-friendly and permit workers to receive updates.
On an intranet, a learning center is an excellent approach to facilitating team member education. It offers workers a single area to acquire training content, guides, and other resources. HR may also utilize your intranet for new employee orientation, including the safe exchange of corporate information before a team member’s official start date.
Organizations on a global scale require solutions that can service them in different locations. A multilingual intranet guarantees that all workers, regardless of their native language, get access to the same data and capabilities. Users can use built-in translation tools to localize material or professional translators for more precise translations.
Blogs are the cornerstone of team member participation in your intranet initiative. They allow the team member to share views, opinions, anecdotes, and recommendations, and they also help colleagues better understand one another. Although top-down data is crucial to internal communications, an intranet that offers employees a voice is what fosters team member participation. This platform’s democratization reveals itself through forums, social commentary, and, most notably, blogging.
See More: Modem vs. Router: Understanding the Key Differences
To maximize the investment in intranet software (whether self-owned or hosted), it is essential to adhere to the following best practices:
The intranet should be where both formal and informal private communications are posted and discussed. The first stage is discouraging and eliminating alternative internal communication channels, such as newsletters, lengthy email threads, obsolete chat applications, etc. Otherwise, your employees will be inundated with irrelevant content to them or their teams, and they will cease frequently monitoring the intranet.
Early intranets mainly consisted of lists of links. In the modern day, however, intranets have expanded to incorporate file management and corporate newsletters. The most effective intranets are designed with a recognizable social experience to accommodate an ever-younger workforce.
An intranet SWOT assessment helps determine what your network must do. This is a lengthy procedure, but the initial step is to record as much information as possible about the communication platforms your staff is now using. If you currently have an intranet, examine its statistics to see how your workers utilize it and what features should be enhanced.
The messages posted on your intranet cannot consist only of HR-written corporate news. To keep your users interested and active on the platform, you must push postings that speak to their interests and acknowledge their contributions to the organization. You will continue to broadcast vital developments, but the news feed should focus on the individuals who make your organization what it is.
Intranets assist various organizational processes, such as HR self-service, information management, internal comms, leadership comms, and collaboration. Due to the intranet’s extensive usage and influence throughout the company, businesses need sustained participation from various stakeholders, including HR, IT, internal communications, senior leadership, and others. Typically, organizations should represent this engagement in continuous governance.
Typically, businesses gather statistics on adoption and use, reach, engagement, user happiness, search outcomes, the individual success of various content types, and more. However, measuring is most effective if there is a consistent approach to continuous development. When measuring, ensure you examine and comprehend what the results imply, make modifications or adjustments, remeasure to determine the effect, and then make more modifications.
See More: What Is Network Topology? Definition, Types With Diagrams, and Selection Best Practices for 2022
In recent years, the usefulness of the intranet has come under question. As companies shift to employee experience platforms, is a purpose-built intranet necessary? The answer is YES. It provides a highly customizable and secure space for collaboration, engagement, and productivity, which also serves to strengthen company culture. That is why research firm Technavio estimates that the intranet software market will grow by over $15 billion by 2026, aided by the rise of cloud computing. 
Did this article fully explain what an intranet is, and what it does? Tell us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. We’d love to hear from you!  

Technical Writer
Popular Articles

source

MongoDB announces columnstore indexing for its document database  The Register
source

A content services platform is cloud-based SaaS software that enables users to create, share, collaborate on and store text, audio and video content. Content services platform (CSP), not to be confused with cloud service provider, is a relatively new term that is gaining acceptance as a successor to enterprise content management (ECM) software.
Several prominent vendors — notably Box, Hyland and Nuxeo — use the term, or variants such as content services to describe their software.
Also, tech analyst firm Gartner formally declared in 2017 that it would henceforth use CSP instead of ECM to identify vendors and their services in what Gartner described as a fast-growing market.
One way of explaining the evolution to content services platforms from ECM systems is that the newer concept of delivering content services reflects a shift from self-contained systems and repositories to open services, according to Gartner.
A content services platform expands the range of what an ECM has traditionally done from handling documents to managing more diverse forms of data.
In contrast to ECM systems and their main function of storing content in the enterprise, content services platforms are designed for active use of content data by individuals, workgroups and teams across the extended enterprise. In addition to internal employees, partners, contractors and others can interact with the enterprise through a CSP.
Security capabilities of a content services platform can easily extend to external third parties.
CSPs also are defined by their emphasis on services and microservices and can be installed either as a product suite or as separate applications with common APIs and repositories.
Also, CSPs serve a variety of parties, including users, systems and applications.
Common capabilities include the following:
Many of the vendors with products in the CSP category have simply expanded their ECM products and spun them into service-oriented architecture platforms with integrated content-related services and microservices, content repositories and tools.
Content services platform vendors include OpenText, Microsoft, IBM, M-Files, Oracle, Alfresco, Laserfiche, Newgen Software, Micro Focus, iManage, Fabasoft and Objective.
Editor’s note: This article was written by Shaun Sutner in 2018. TechTarget editors revised it in 2022 to improve the reader experience.
The analytics vendor and open source tool have already developed integrations that combine self-service BI and semantic modeling,…
Free Ingest encourages the vendor’s customers to use its data import tools, rather than a third party’s, to reduce the complexity…
In addition to an easy-to-use BI platform, keys to developing a successful data culture driven by business analysts include a …
Expect more organizations to optimize data usage to drive decision intelligence and operations in 2023, as the new year will be …
These 10 roles, with different responsibilities, are commonly a part of the data management teams that organizations rely on to …
These eight challenges complicate efforts to integrate data for operational and analytics uses. Here’s why, plus advice on how to…
As companies adopt measures to improve sustainability goals, enterprise applications can play a key role. But these efforts must …
Additive and subtractive manufacturing are two different approaches that are often combined by manufacturers. Learn the …
An efficient supply chain starts with proactive preparation and the right technology. Learn more about the potential of digital …
With its Cerner acquisition, Oracle sets its sights on creating a national, anonymized patient database — a road filled with …
Oracle plans to acquire Cerner in a deal valued at about $30B. The second-largest EHR vendor in the U.S. could inject new life …
The Supreme Court ruled 6-2 that Java APIs used in Android phones are not subject to American copyright law, ending a …
Critical SAP vulnerabilities are a constant concern and are increasing as SAP systems open more due to digital transformation and…
SAP Build, a new low-code platform that debuted at SAP TechEd, is designed to enable business users to create apps, but it’s …
SAP Sustainability Control Tower enables companies of all sizes to gather and manage ESG data. The revamped SaaS model focuses on…
All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2011 – 2022, TechTarget

Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

source

Our research-based reviews and recommendations are funded in part by affiliate links, at no extra cost to our readers and without impact to our editorial independence. Click to Learn More
monday.com is better for project management than Smartsheet, although both services are great. With monday.com, you will find more features, slightly more customer support options, and plans that start at $6 per user, per month, which is a full dollar less costly than Smartsheet’s starting price.
However, Smartsheet is no slouch. We found the interface is easier to navigate than monday.com’s because the spreadsheet view is more adaptable than any other project management software and it will appeal to spreadsheet experts.
Our researchers have studied business software for years to bring you the best data insights on its functionality, hidden costs, and ability to work with your existing software. Smartsheet and monday.com are two of the best — even if, again, monday.com is better.
In this guide:
Smartsheet
monday.com
Ease of use
Customization
Unlimited (all plans)
A great tool for spreadsheet-natives, which can take your Excel-based task planning to the next level, and there’s a free trial, too.
A great task management system due to strong customizablity and support team, with a generous Free Trial period.
While both services are excellent, our researchers found Smartsheet to be better than monday.com in one category, while monday.com was better than Smartsheet in four categories. Smartsheet is easier to use than monday.com, but monday.com offers more features, better value for its cost, better customer support, and has a higher customer favorability than Smartsheet.
Overall, monday.com is a better pick for a modern design that will meet the need of most companies: We give monday.com a solid score of 4.7/5, slightly higher than Smartsheet’s 4.6/5 score.
Smartsheet will handle all of your company’s project management needs, from setting tasks and milestones to gathering feedback once the job is complete. It is very easy to learn and use, thanks to a flexible spreadsheet interface, powerful chart building tool with custom data fields, and a simple instant-messenger chat function.
Despite this general ease of use, though, the service won’t offer preset charts, so figuring out the chart building tool is a must rather than a maybe. Plus, the lowest plan tier limits its data visualisation tools. While we favor monday.com on the whole, we would recommend Smartsheet for any Excel or Google Sheet experts, since it is the best spreadsheet alternative on the market.
Pros
Cons
With monday.com, businesses will get the features and customer support they need at a price that’s lower than Smartsheet (though it’s not the lowest on the market). Highlights of the service include an automation builder for better customization, along with the functionality needed for fast project setup and project updates. A free plan is available, too, although automations are limited.
Downsides of monday.com include a slight learning curve for handling the form builder, as well as a few plan-specific restrictions for integrations and Gantt charts. Most modern businesses will find it delivers the right combination of functionality, ease of use, and affordability.
Pros
Cons
monday.com offers a better value for its cost than Smartsheet. This is because monday.com’s starter plan, Basic, costs $6 per user, per month, while Smartsheet’s comparable starter plan, Pro, starts at a dollar more, for $7 per user, per month.
monday.com also undercuts Smartsheets when it comes to the two high-end (non-Enterprise) plans, as monday.com’s $22 per user, per month plan costs less than Smartsheets’ $25 per user, per month plan.
That said, the two services offer a different range of features under all their plans, so the best option will depend on the needs of your business. We still rate Smartsheets higher in usability — one big reason is the lack of automations or integrations under monday.com’s Basic plan, given that the similar Smartsheets Pro plan offers 250 automations per month.
It’s worth noting that our researchers found more than a few other project management software options to offer a higher value for the price: ClickUp, Favro, Jira, Trello and Zoho projects all fared better in this category.
Smartsheet offers three plans: Pro, for $7 per user, per month when paid annually or $9 per user, per month paid monthly; Business, for $25 per user, per month when paid annually or $32 per user, per month paid monthly; and Enterprise, for a custom quote.
Smartsheet doesn’t offer a permanent free plan, but it does have a 30-day free trial and, like most project management products, will allow a third-party to collaborate with a paying Smartsheet user as a guest.
Pro
Business
Enterprise
$7/user/month
$25/user/month
Custom
1 – 10
3 – Unlimited
Unlimited
10
100
Unlimited
20 GB
1TB
Unlimited
Pro offers a fairly high user cap of 25, but comes with other restrictions — users get just 10 projects and 10 guests (both are unlimited across all monday.com plans) along with caps of 20GB storage and 250 automations per month. These caps are better than monday.com’s own starter plan restrictions of 5GB storage and no automations. Users are also limited to one dashboard and five custom chart builders.
Pro users get all the big mangement tool options: Gantt Chart, Kanban Board, a spreadsheet-type view, sub-tasks, milestones, task dependencies, and custom fields, as well as both pre-built and custom automations and project templates. They’ll get email support and an online knowledge hub, but won’t receive phone, live chat, or 24/7 support.
Collaboration features include a calendar, team messaging, and task comments, but do not include resource management, an online whiteboard, or document editing tools.
Business has everything in Pro, and removes most caps: Users, guests, automations and integrations are all unlimited, although there is a three-user minimum, while the storage limit is boosted to an impressive 1TB (matching monday.com’s Enterprise storage), and projects are capped at 100 per user.
Features are expanded slightly, with a focus on team management:  User permissions, resource management and document editing are added, phone support is available for an additional fee, and dashboards and custom chart builders are now unlimited.
Enterprise removes any remaining restrictions on projects per user and storage, while also including 24/7 phone support at no extra charge. It also adds single sign-on for better security, but no major features are added beyond that. In contast to monday.com’s enterprise plan, Smartsheet’s plan doesn’t include any onboarding assistence.
Check out our full guide to Smartsheet pricing for a full breakdown of how far your money will go.
monday.com offers five plans: Individual, the free plan; Basic, for $6 per user, per month when paid annually or $8 per user, per month paid monthly; Standard, for $10 per user, per month when paid annually or $12 per user, per month when paid monthly; Pro, for $22 per user, per month when paid annually or $27 per user, per month when paid monthly; and Enterprise, for a customized plan.
There’s no free trial, but that’s because users can just get the free Individual plan to test drive the platform.
Individual 
Basic
Standard
Pro
Enterprise
Free
$8/user/month
$10/user/month
$16/user/month
On request
Free
$10/user/month
$12/user/month
$20/user/month
On request
2
Unlimited
Unlimited
Unlimited
Unlimited
Unlimited
Unlimited
Unlimited
Unlimited
Unlimited
500 MB
5 GB
20 GB
100 GB
1,000 GB
24/7
24/7
24/7
24/7
24/7
None
None
250 actions per month
25,000 actions per month
25,000 actions per month
None
None
250 actions per month
25,000 actions per month
25,000 actions per month
The monday.com Individual plan is free and, like all permanent free plans, it’s too limited to work for most needs. There is no longer a project limit, but users are capped at two, while no automations or integrations are allowed at all. Storage is limited to 500MB as well.
Individual users will get access to email support as well as all of the features offered under the Basic plan. Still, without access to automations, the service won’t save you much time, and you’ll also bump up against the storage cap fairly quickly.
Basic offers unlimited users and expands the storage limit to 5GB, but automations or integrations are still not offered.
Task management tools include a Kanban Board and spreadsheet-type view, sub-tasks, and custom fields, but no Gantt chart or task dependencies. Milestones can be measured with a workaround, but aren’t included as a main feature in the Basic, or in any plan. Preset and custom project templates are available, and data visualization tools include dashboards, a widget builder, and preset charts and widgets. You’ll also get task comments, an online whiteboard, and document editing, but will not have access to resource management tools, team messaging, calendars, or a project message board.
Security features include two-factor authentication and user permissions. Email support is offered, but (like all monday.com plans) it’s not 24/7 and there’s no phone or live chat option.
Standard doesn’t add much to the Basic plan. The big additions are automations and integrations, both capped at 250 actions per month. You’ll also get the Gantt chart view and the ability to offer guest access, as well as a calendar — which is useful for scheduling when collaborating with colleages.
Pro increases the storage limit to 100GB and dramatically expands the automations and integrations to 25,000 actions per month. New features include task dependencies, budget management (using the  ‘Formula Column’ feature), a custom chart builder, resource management, and time tracking.
Finally, Enterprise adds onboarding assistance and the largest caps yet, as well as 1,000GB storage and 250,000 actions per month for automations and integrations. Much like Smartsheet’s enterprise option, it’s a plan for big companies that have outgrown the previous plan.
Check out our full page on monday.com’s pricing for an in-depth breakdown.
monday.com offers a better free plan than Smartsheet because it includes all the features available from monday.com’s paid Basic plan, although extra limitations are included. monday.com’s free plan may be called “Individual,” but it actually supports up to two users.
Meanwhile, Smartsheet doesn’t offer a full free plan, but does allow users to share projects with guests, who can then view, edit, and update the projects as if they are a user.
In the end, though, neither free option is likely to cut the mustard for any growing company. Starting out with monday.com’s Individual plan isn’t a bad idea, but the benefits of project management software kick in when you start using automations to make repetitive actions less time-consuming, and add integrations to help you handle all your software needs from one hub.
Once a paid plan has saved you a few hours of work across an entire month, it has likely paid for itself.
Both monday.com and Smartsheet are easy to use, but Smartsheet comes out on top in this category. Our researchers tested usability across multiple subcategories such as responsiveness to changes and closing stages, including gathering feedback or giving access to guests.
Smartsheet really pulls ahead in the responsiveness subcategory. Updating a spreadsheet is a fast process, whether you’re reassigning tasks or tweaking budgets. Smartsheet also has a sidebar for extra tools, such as team messaging.
Smartsheet doesn’t offer any preset charts for viewing project data, so users will have to build them. While this does add a learning curve, it also allows for more customization. In contrast, monday.com requires setup as well, yet doesn’t offer some project data views at all: even our researchers couldn’t satisfactorily figure out how to measure project progress vs remaining time.
While both options are customizable and fairly easy to use, Smartsheet wins in the end.
Spreadsheet and monday.com are neck-and-neck for setting up projects.
Again, monday.com is very customizable, using a system called “Items” with rows to represent each task. Editing takes such a few clicks, speeding up the project setup process that any manager is familar with by avoiding the need to fill in endless fields. Automations are limited to between 250 and 250,000 actions per month, depending on the plan.
Smartsheet’s setup process is easy, too, with a design similar to Excel or Google Sheets. The service’s project management templates pre-populate columns for the name, duration, assignee, and start and finish dates for a task. Custom workarounds can be added quickly for features Smartsheet doesn’t offer, like budgeting — which is good, since the limited amount of preset templates means that most users will eventually need to build their own.
Both monday.com and Smartsheet come with the essential task management tools: Gantt charts, Kanban Boards, a spreadsheet view, sub-tasks, task dependencies, and custom fields. Milestones can be set up in both services: Users on monday.com can use the ‘Groups’ feature, with each Group’s collection of tasks comprising one milestone.
monday.com’s “Items” system of rows and columns lets users set up each task, while Smartsheet uses a pre-populated spreadsheet.
Creating custom automations is a more simple process with monday.com, since the service offers an undemanding text-based creator, compared to Smartsheet’s complex flow-chart style builder.
Both monday.com and Smartsheet offer great support for their customers, although monday.com is ultimately ahead by a nose.
Users for both services will get an online knowledge base and community forum for solving quick issues and common questions, as well as email-based support for tougher problems.
Smartsheet does make 24/7 phone support available, while monday.com does not. However, it’s only for Smartsheet’s Business and Enterprise plans, and it’s a paid add-on for the Business plan as well. Smartsheet does not offer onboarding support, while monday.com includes it free for Enterprise customers.
Neither Smartsheet nor monday.com will give you the absolute best bang for your buck. Smartsheet starts at $7 per user, per month, while monday.com starts at $6 per user, per month. That’s not the worst cost and may be below the industry average, but it’s not the lowest cost either.
Here are three top project management software services that our researchers have found will deliver the goods for less. Alternatively, if you’d like to see how Smartsheet stacks up against a database management tool, check out our Smartsheet vs Airtable comparison.
Zoho Projects offers the best value: It starts at $4 per user, per month when paid annually, and offers a free tier as well. It delivers a functional platform with two different automation builders (simple and complex), plenty of collaboration features, and — unlike monday.com or Smartsheet — dedicated budgeting tools.
That said, it does not offer the strong customization or usability you’ll get from both monday.com and Smartsheet, so you’ll have to learn how to navigate a somewhat finicky system with a lot of menus to sort through. You can learn more about Zoho Projects in our full pricing guide.
Pros
Cons
 
ClickUp’s starter plan costs $5 per user, per month when paid annually, and it has a free plan, too. Top benefits include quick setup, an instant-messenger functionality, and the 24/7 live chat support that you might be missing from both monday.com or Smartsheet. But you’ll face plan-based restrictions on how many times you can use certain features, with automations restricted heavily under the first two plans, and the service isn’t built for post-project feedback discussions. Our full review of Clickup has the rundown.
Pros
Cons
Favro isn’t quite as inexpensive as Zoho Projects and Clickup, since the lowest plan starts at $10.20 per month, which covers two users. Costs will increase in tiers rather than the typical per-user pricing, with 3-5 users costing $25.50 per month, 6-10 users costing $51 per month, and so on. You’ll get an easy-to-use interface for setting up tasks quickly, along with a straightforward burndown chart creator. Task dependancies can be complicated to set up, though, and Excel experts will miss being able to use formulas within the spreadsheet-style interface, as they are not supported.
Pros
Cons
Tech.co’s researchers are unbiased, with years of experience under their belt, and frequently revisit all scores to chart evolutions in software features or pricing. For the project management software category, we have tested and analyzed 14 products, all using the same five criteria, each of which might be further broken down into subcategories. These are:
In the end, we ranked every software on a scale of 1-10 stars under every criteria, and then added them all up and divided by the number of criteria to arrive at a single five-star final score that displayed the total value of each service.
That said, Smartsheet and monday.com are both impressive tools, offering easy-to-use and highly customizable interfaces, as well as — depending on the plan — all the features you’ll need. Either option should serve you well.
They’re not the only project management tools worth considering, though. From ClickUp’s unbeatable featureset to Zoho Project’s low $5 per user price, there’s a software for every business.
Tech.co is reader-supported. If you make a purchase through the links on our site, we may earn a commission from the retailers of the products we have reviewed. This helps Tech.co to provide free advice and reviews for our readers, at no additional cost to you. Merchant partnerships do not affect the content of our reviews, which are based on objective research analysis. Rare exceptions to this will be marked clearly as a ‘sponsored’ table column, or explained by a full advertorial disclosure on the page, in place of this one. Click to return to top of page
Verifying
We’re sorry this article didn’t help you today – we welcome feedback, so if there’s any way you feel we could improve our content, please email us at contact@tech.co
Adam is a writer at Tech.co and has worked as a tech writer, blogger and copy editor for more than a decade. He’s also a Forbes Contributor on the publishing industry, for which he was named a Digital Book World 2018 award finalist. His work has appeared in publications including Popular Mechanics and IDG Connect, and he has an art history book on 1970s sci-fi coming out from Abrams Books in 2022. In the meantime, he’s hunting own the latest news on VPNs, POS systems, and the future of tech.
© Copyright 2022

source